lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 9 Jun 2014 09:41:51 +0000
From:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: SCTP connect() both ways

When SCTP is used for protocols like M3UA it seems common
to configure both port numbers for a connection (typically
to the same value).

Rather than having one system call connect() and the other
listen(), both systems really want to try to establish the
connection by sending out INIT chunks.

The connection then gets established as soon as the second of the
two systems attempts to establish it.

However if the remote system responds with an ABORT (or maybe
an ICMP error is received) the Linux SCTP stack immediately
reports 'connect failed'.
For these sorts of connections it would be much better if the
received ABORT just increased the retry timer to large value.

Thoughts?

	David



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ