lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1402330502.3645.378.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:15:02 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Per Hurtig <per.hurtig@....se>
Cc:	Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@...gle.com>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Anna Brunström <anna.brunstrom@....se>,
	mohammad.rajiullah@....se, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: fixing TLP's FIN recovery

On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:56 +0200, Per Hurtig wrote:

> 
> Ok, I guess you mean that the retransmission was not fast enough? But 
> will the same not happen if the original FIN is not lost and triggers a 
> SACK (i.e., if the two last data segments are still lost)?

Yes, I'd like to understand why Nandita specifically added the original
test. In her tests, fast retransmit was not really effective.

Running packetdrill in a separate container gives me these interesting
counters :

# nstat
#kernel
IpInReceives                    4                  0.0
IpInDelivers                    4                  0.0
IpOutRequests                   5                  0.0
TcpPassiveOpens                 1                  0.0
TcpInSegs                       4                  0.0
TcpOutSegs                      10                 0.0
TcpRetransSegs                  2                  0.0
TcpExtTCPPureAcks               3                  0.0
TcpExtTCPSackRecovery           1                  0.0
TcpExtTCPFastRetrans            1                  0.0
TcpExtTCPLossProbes             1                  0.0
TcpExtTCPSackRecoveryFail       1                  0.0
TcpExtTCPSackShiftFallback      1                  0.0
TcpExtTCPRetransFail            4                  0.0   <<<< HERE >>>
TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent           9                  0.0
IpExtInOctets                   184                0.0
IpExtOutOctets                  9212               0.0
IpExtInNoECTPkts                4                  0.0

I guess we need to understand why the retransmit is in error.

I am investigating.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ