[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+ZOOTPmE9pKyLaYA-ZX9G1v7q2GV2h0RV0REAqT-ocA_xRkfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 10:10:27 -0700
From: Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: filter: cleanup A/X name usage
Acked-by: Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>
Great job!
-Chema
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 06/06/2014 11:46 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>
>> The macro 'A' used in internal BPF interpreter:
>> #define A regs[insn->a_reg]
>> was easily confused with the name of classic BPF register 'A', since
>> 'A' would mean two different things depending on context.
>>
>> This patch is trying to clean up the naming and clarify its usage in the
>> following way:
>>
>> - A and X are names of two classic BPF registers
>>
>> - BPF_REG_A denotes internal BPF register R0 used to map classic register
>> A
>> in internal BPF programs generated from classic
>>
>> - BPF_REG_X denotes internal BPF register R7 used to map classic register
>> X
>> in internal BPF programs generated from classic
>>
>> - internal BPF instruction format:
>> struct sock_filter_int {
>> __u8 code; /* opcode */
>> __u8 dst_reg:4; /* dest register */
>> __u8 src_reg:4; /* source register */
>> __s16 off; /* signed offset */
>> __s32 imm; /* signed immediate constant */
>> };
>>
>> - BPF_X/BPF_K is 1 bit used to encode source operand of instruction
>> In classic:
>> BPF_X - means use register X as source operand
>> BPF_K - means use 32-bit immediate as source operand
>> In internal:
>> BPF_X - means use 'src_reg' register as source operand
>> BPF_K - means use 32-bit immediate as source operand
>>
>> Suggested-by: Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
>
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
>
> You could also have mentioned in the changelog that you replace
> direct access to ctx pointer with CTX register, it's valid since
> we emit a mov from ARG1 to CTX at the beginning which contains
> ctx. Anyway, looks good to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists