netdev - Re: [net-next 01/13] i40e: add checks for AQ error status bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1402347725.3142.19.camel@joe-AO725>
Date:	Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:02:05 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	davem@...emloft.net, Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...el.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 01/13] i40e: add checks for AQ error status bits

On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 13:35 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:21 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > On 06/09/2014 12:49 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > From: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...el.com>

> > > If the Firmware sets these bits, it will trigger an AdminQ
> > > interrupt to get the driver's attention to process the ARQ, which will
> > > likely be enough to clear the actual issue.
 
> >     Hm, why not dev_err() here and below?

> The thought was that these should be more of "FYI..." type of messages
> not "Oh Crap!..." messages.  So that is why dev_err() was not used,
> although we are not opposed to changing it if you feel it warrants it in
> a follow-up patch.
[]
> > > +	if (val & I40E_PF_ATQLEN_ATQCRIT_MASK) {
> > > +		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "ASQ Critical Error detected\n");
> > > +		val &= ~I40E_PF_ATQLEN_ATQCRIT_MASK;
> > > +	}

I thought it was odd to have a "critical error"
emitted at KERN_INFO

Maybe adding something like
	"ARQ should fix this automatically"
would be enough.

Should any/all of these be ratelimited or maybe even
changed to dev_dbg?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html