[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1725A303@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:10:45 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Fugang Duan' <b38611@...escale.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com"
<ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
"b20596@...escale.com" <b20596@...escale.com>,
"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 5/6] net: fec: Add Scatter/gather support
From: Fugang Duan
> Add Scatter/gather support for FEC.
> This feature allows to improve outbound throughput performance.
...
> +static int fec_enet_get_free_txdesc_num(struct fec_enet_private *fep)
> +{
> + int entries;
> +
> + entries = ((const char *)fep->dirty_tx -
> + (const char *)fep->cur_tx) / fep->bufdesc_size;
> +
> + return (fep->cur_tx >= fep->dirty_tx) ?
> + entries += fep->tx_ring_size : entries;
> +}
That is a strange return statement - why += ??
You could also check the sign of 'entries'.
Say:
return entries > 0 ? entries : entries + fep->tx_ring_size;
Actually do you ever use the last entry?
If you do then the full and empty conditions are not separated.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists