netdev - Re: mm/sched/net: BUG when running simple code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140613045555.GB20729@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2014 07:55:55 +0300
From:	Dan Aloni <dan@...nelim.com>
To:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: mm/sched/net: BUG when running simple code

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 06/12/2014 11:27 PM, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> > 
> >> > Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't really explain what's
> >> > going on. It seems that we get a "unable to handle kernel paging request" when running
> >> > rather simple code, and I can't figure out how it would cause it.
> > [..]
> >> > Which agrees with the trace I got:
> >> > 
> >> > [  516.309720] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffa0f12560
> >> > [  516.309720] IP: netlink_getsockopt (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2271)
> > [..]
> >> > [  516.309720] RIP netlink_getsockopt (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2271)
> >> > [  516.309720]  RSP <ffff8803fc85fed8>
> >> > [  516.309720] CR2: ffffffffa0f12560
> >> > 
> >> > They only theory I had so far is that netlink is a module, and has gone away while the code
> >> > was executing, but netlink isn't a module on my kernel.
> > The RIP - 0xffffffffa0f12560 is in the range (from Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt):
> > 
> >     ffffffffa0000000 - ffffffffff5fffff (=1525 MB) module mapping space
> > 
> > So seems it was in a module.
> 
> Yup, that's why that theory came up, but when I checked my config:
> 
> $ cat .config | grep NETLINK
> CONFIG_COMPAT_NETLINK_MESSAGES=y
> CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK=y
> CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_ACCT=y
> CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_QUEUE=y
> CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_LOG=y
> CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK=y
> CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK_TIMEOUT=y
> CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK_HELPER=y
> CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_QUEUE_CT=y
> CONFIG_NETLINK_MMAP=y
> CONFIG_NETLINK_DIAG=y
> CONFIG_SCSI_NETLINK=y
> CONFIG_QUOTA_NETLINK_INTERFACE=y
> 
> that theory went away. (also confirmed by not finding a netlink module.)
> 
> What about the kernel .text overflowing into the modules space? The loader
> checks for that, but can something like that happen after everything is
> up and running? I'll look into that tomorrow.

The kernel .text needs to be more than 512MB for the overlap to happen. 

    ffffffff80000000 - ffffffffa0000000 (=512 MB)  kernel text mapping, from phys 0

Also, it is bizarre that symbol resolution resolved ffffffffa0f12560 to 
a symbol that is in module space where af_netlink.o is surely not because of 
"obj-y := af_netlink.o" in the Makefile. 

What does your /proc/kallsyms show when sorted with regards to the symbols
in question?

Also curious are the addresses you have on the stack:

> [  516.309720] Stack:
> [  516.309720]  ffff8803fc85ff18 ffff8803fc85ff18 ffff8803fc85fef8 8900200549908020
> [  516.309720]  ffff8803fc85ff18 ffffffff9ff66470 ffff8803fc85ff18 0000000000000037
> [  516.309720]  ffff8803fc85ff78 ffffffff9ff69d26 0000000000000037 0000000000000004

0xffffffff9ff69d26 is just a small space before the beginning of the module 
mapping space, at the end of the kernel text mapping. Unless there are 
some tricks on those mappings, they should be unused, or perhaps 
CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is at play here?

And also, the Oops code of 0003 (PF_WRITE and PF_USER) might hint at
what Dave wrote.

-- 
Dan Aloni
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html