[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <539DBBB5.3000906@mojatatu.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 11:28:53 -0400
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: vyasevic@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
stephen@...workplumber.org
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com,
john.r.fastabend@...el.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/2] bridge: netlink dump interface at par with
brctl
On 06/10/14 09:25, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>
> I gave it some thought and I think something like the following
> pseudo-code would work.
>
> dump_dev_fdbs(dev, filter)
> {
> if (dev->dumper)
> dev->ndo_dumper(dev, filter);
> else
> default_dumper(dev, filter);
> }
>
> for_each_netdev() {
> if (bridge_filter) {
> if (dev->index != bridge_filter)
> skip;
>
> dump_dev_fdbs(dev, port_filter);
> } else {
> if (port_filter) {
> if (bridge_port &&
> dev->index != port_filter)
> skip;
>
> }
>
> if (bridge_port) {
> br_dev = get_bridge();
> dump_dev_fdbs(br_dev, port_filter);
> }
>
> dump_dev_fdbs(dev, port_filter);
> }
> }
>
>
> What do you think?
Too bad i missed the net-next submission.
I am not sure what you suggest above will improve upon readability,
but i will take another run at it when Dave opens up.
I know reading the patch was hard - the code was not as bad.
We'll see.
cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists