netdev - Re: [PATCH] net/cadence/macb: clear interrupts simply and correctly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ea57b37f-1f1c-40a0-84a6-46b0b78ec6b4@BY2FFO11FD034.protection.gbl>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:56:27 -0700
From:	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To:	Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@....com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Hayun Hwang <hwang.hayun@....com>,
	Youngkyu Choi <youngkyu7.choi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/cadence/macb: clear interrupts simply and correctly

On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 02:00PM +0900, Jongsung Kim wrote:
> On 06/13/2014 12:44 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > Hi Jongsung,
> 
> Hi Sören,
> 
> > Does this interrupt need to be enabled? There is nothing checking
> > that bit and handling this IRQ in the handler, AFAICT. And you solve
> > this by simply clearing the bit. So, I wonder whether not enabling this
> > IRQ in the first place would solve things too.
> 
> The driver actually checks the bit, but does not clear it. Disabling the
> "Rx used bit read" interrupt you said may be a solution. However, I think
> it is the better way to clear the exceptional HW-state rather than just to
> mask it.
Hmm, I must have missed that.

> 
> > This is now clearing all IRQ flags which is probably not what we want
> > here. This is handling RX only. We still want the non-RX interrupts to go to
> > the actual interrupt service routing.
> 
> The ISR(Interrupt Status Register) is read only in the interrupt service
> routine, macb_interrupt. But is partially cleared here and there. Further
> handler-functions decide jobs to be done by reading/checking other status
> registers. (e.g., TSR, RSR) So, clearing the ISR after reading looks not
> a bad idea.
But you are clearing _all_ interrupt flags in the RX NAPI handler.
Doesn't that mean we might miss certain events?

	Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html