[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ae893536ee24657ba12043a5f9beabf@BLUPR03MB373.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 01:40:11 +0000
From: "fugang.duan@...escale.com" <fugang.duan@...escale.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: fec: remove HW IP header checksum for IPV6 frame
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> Data: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 7:22 AM
>To: David Miller
>Cc: Duan Fugang-B38611; netdev@...r.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fec: remove HW IP header checksum for IPV6 frame
>
>On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 03:34:07PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
>> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:31:21 +0100
>> > As I suspected, just applying the above two hunks fixes the problem
>> > I was seeing.
>>
>> Someone please respin the patch so that it's just these two hunks and
>> that the commit message accurately describes the real situation.
>
>I'm hoping for a reply from Freescale before I give an explicit tested-by
>against this. It would be nice to have some explicit confirmation that
>they would be happy with a reduced patch. It may be that the hardware
>really does need the IP header checksum bit cleared for non-IPv4 packets.
>
I test it again that is your expectation HW can detect IPV6 frame type, if it is IPV6 packet,
The IP header checksum function don't take effect.
I will submit the patch again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists