[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.03.1406200018500.7347@ws.cisco>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:22:22 +0530 (IST)
From: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_govind@....com>
To: Chema Gonzalez <chema@...keley.edu>
cc: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_govind@....com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, ssujith@...co.com,
gvaradar@...co.com, benve@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] flow_keys: Record IP layer protocol in
skb_flow_dissect()
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Chema Gonzalez wrote:
> If you add n_proto, have you considered adding nhoff too? That way the
> L3 and L4 headers will be completely pinned by the flow dissector.
>
Yes, I have actually considered it. But right now there is no one who would need
nhoff. We can add it later when we need it?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists