[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140623.021110.1153969828079234680.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 02:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: wei.liu2@...rix.com
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, ian.campbell@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] xen-netback: bookkeep number of active queues
in our own module
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:40:32 +0100
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 05:21:05PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
>> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 14:31:41 +0100
>>
>> >
>> > + /* Initialisation completed, tell core driver the number of
>> > + * active queues.
>> > + */
>> > + rtnl_lock();
>> > + netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(be->vif->dev, requested_num_queues);
>> > + netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(be->vif->dev, requested_num_queues);
>> > + rtnl_unlock();
>> > +
>> > xenvif_carrier_on(be->vif);
>>
>> This function _NEVER_ set the number of RX queues beforehand,
>> therefore why are you adding an RX queue adjustment now?
>>
>
> As I went through the core driver code I found this to be a missing call
> in previous code.
>
> "In current Xen multiqueue design, the number of TX queues and RX queues
> are in fact the same. So we need to set the numbers of TX and RX queues
> to the same value."
>
> Does the above paragraph answers your question? If so, I will add it to
> commit message and resend this patch.
Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists