[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140625073215.GB5566@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:32:15 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: net-timestamp: MSG_TSTAMP flags and bytestream support
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:43:45AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> This patchset extends socket timestamping in a number of related ways.
> Most notably:
>
> 2 MSG_TSTAMP: request a single tx timestamp by passing a flag on send
> 6 MSG_TSTAMP_ENQ: request a tx timestamp before traffic shaping.
> 5 MSG_TSTAMP_ACK: request a tx timestamp after acknowledgements (TCP)
> 4 TCP support for all three flags
Can you tell us a bit about the use case? It sounds like that this is
for performance monitoring.
> Each individual patch commit message gives more detail about the
> specific feature.
>
> The other patches support the main feature:
> 1 explicitly define the timestamp response API
> 3 optionally avoid looping large packets onto the socket error queue.
> 7 documentation and an example test.
I think #2 and #3 could be improvements to the so_timestamping api.
The others probably need their own, separate api. I can't imagine
wanting to mix so_timestamping with these new tcp time stamps, but
maybe you want to explain the expected scenario?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists