lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:28:43 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: lojakab@...co.com Cc: chris@...icalelegance.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, vermagan@...co.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 net-next] LISP: Locator/Identifier Separation Protocol From: Lori Jakab <lojakab@...co.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:31:57 +0300 > The OVS datapath's flow table is also influenced by traffic patterns > sent by external hosts. But while the IPv4 routing table is not > optional for a networked host, OVS and LISP are, and people deploying > them can still find value using them, in controlled environments at > least. You haven't shown how this is not exploitable if remote entities can control the contents of your tables and how frequently they must be updated. I also worry about OVS, for the same reasons. It isn't an answer to say that these technologies work fine if you lock up the machine into a controlled environemt. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists