[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1403845697.21873.1.camel@concordia>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:08:17 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc: Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc: bpf: Fix the broken LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT
test
On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 10:36 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 06/26/2014 10:30 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 21:34 +0400, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> >> We have to return the boolean here if the tag presents
> >> or not, not just ANDing the TCI with the mask which results to:
> >>
> >> [ 709.412097] test_bpf: #18 LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT
> >> [ 709.412245] ret 4096 != 1
> >> [ 709.412332] ret 4096 != 1
> >> [ 709.412333] FAIL (2 times)
> >
> > Hi Denis,
> >
> > Is this the same version of test_bpf that is in Linus' tree?
> >
> > I don't see any fails with that version, am I missing something?
> >
> > [ 187.690640] test_bpf: #18 LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT 46 50 PASS
>
> Did you try to modprobe test_bpf after enabling JIT, i.e. :
>
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
>
> Last time I tested with ppc64, I saw the interpreter passing
> while JIT failed, which the fix above should address.
Right, I thought CONFIG_BPF_JIT=y was sufficient.
But that just makes it available, I need to *also* enable it at runtime.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists