netdev - Re: Is: automated testing before David M picks them up? Was: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2] xen-netback: bookkeep number of active queues in our own module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:39:13 +0100
From:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	<wei.liu2@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: Is: automated testing before David M picks them up? Was: Re:
 [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2] xen-netback: bookkeep number of active queues in
 our own module

On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 12:34 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:31:51 -0400
> 
> > Having said that - how do you handle such situation with sub-maintainers
> > wanting to do some testing before they are cleared to go your way?
> 
> Who cares, the bug gets found eventually right?
> 
> There is no value in my letting changes sit for more than a day or two that
> aren't being actively discussed and look fine to me.

So perhaps Konrad ought to be feeding net{,-next}.git to his testing
framework?

Ian.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html