lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:39:13 +0100 From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>, <wei.liu2@...rix.com> Subject: Re: Is: automated testing before David M picks them up? Was: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2] xen-netback: bookkeep number of active queues in our own module On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 12:34 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> > Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:31:51 -0400 > > > Having said that - how do you handle such situation with sub-maintainers > > wanting to do some testing before they are cleared to go your way? > > Who cares, the bug gets found eventually right? > > There is no value in my letting changes sit for more than a day or two that > aren't being actively discussed and look fine to me. So perhaps Konrad ought to be feeding net{,-next}.git to his testing framework? Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists