netdev - [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: sctp: Optimisations to sctp command queue code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1726977C@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:00:57 +0000
From:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: sctp: Optimisations to sctp command queue
 code

These 3 patches optimise the code that processes sctp's command queue.
(A list of 'tasks' to be performed after the rest of the chunk processing.)

1) Inline all the functions from command.c
2) Remove the memset() calls used to zero a word-sized union.
3) Use pointers instead of array indexes.

The combined changes reduce the code size (amd64) by a few kb.

I'm not 100% convinced that the zeroing done in patch 2 is needed at all.
On BE systems it is likely to generate more code than on LE ones.
In fact it might be best to change the union to only contain 'long' sized
items.

	David

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html