[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140701.163153.30109595101601494.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 16:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: p.wilczek@...sung.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
juho80.son@...sung.com, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com,
jkaluza@...hat.com, luto@...capital.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 0/2] send process status in SCM_PROCINFO
From: Piotr Wilczek <p.wilczek@...sung.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:55:52 +0200
> Server-like processes in many cases need credentials and other
> metadata of the peer, to decide if the calling process is allowed to
> request a specific action, or the server just wants to log away this
> type of information for auditing tasks.
>
> The current practice to retrieve such process metadata is to look that
> information up in procfs with the $PID received over SCM_CREDENTIALS.
> This is sufficient for long-running tasks, but introduces a race which
> cannot be worked around for short-living processes; the calling
> process and all the information in /proc/$PID/ is gone before the
> receiver of the socket message can look it up.
>
> Changes introduced in this patchset can also increase performance
> of such server-like processes, because current way of opening and
> parsing /proc/$PID/* files is much more expensive than receiving these
> metadata using SCM.
>
> As an example, this patch set improves systemd-journald performance
> by about 20%. Generally, performance improvement depends on how heavily
> procfs is read the calling process.
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.systemd.devel/19467
>
> This patch set is split in two patches:
> - the first adds library to retrive process information without
> dependency on procfs.
> - the second introduces a new SCM type called SCM_PROCINFO to optionally
> allow the direct attaching of process status to SCM.
I really would like someone smarter than me to review the security
implications et al. of these changes before I apply them.
Andy? Maybe you have an opinion?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists