netdev - Re: [PATCH CFT 00/30] Initial round of Freescale FEC ethernet patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53B2CC2C.7080306@mentor.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Jul 2014 09:56:44 -0500
From:	Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Fugang Duan <B38611@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH CFT 00/30] Initial round of Freescale FEC ethernet patches

On 07/01/2014 09:34 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:21:28AM -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>> [apologies if this is a duplicate, I got a weird SMTP error from my
>> organization's mail server when I tried to send this yesterday]
>>
>> On 06/27/2014 10:15 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> This is v2 of my initial round of patches (roughly half of my total
>>> patch set) for the Freescale FEC driver.
>>>
>>> I'm sending this set out for comments and testing.  So far, I have
>>> had only one ack for one patch in this series, this is pretty poor,
>>> so I'm now sending it with a CFT tag instead.
>>
>> FWIW I've given your fec-testing branch some testing on BD-SL-i.MX6
>> (Sabre Lite) with 3.16-rc2 (-rc1 has some issue with detecting the mmc).
>>  Mainly running glibc 'make check' with SSH, NFSv4, IPv4 on a gigabit
>> switch.  This workload wasn't exhibiting problems before your patches
>> and it does not appear to be regressed by them.
>>
>> I wanted to test it because I've noticed hard-to-characterize sluggish
>> interactive response in SSH sessions on this system.  Like key echo
>> takes 0.2 seconds too long... sometimes.  I guess it could be anything,
>> but I haven't encountered it yet with your patches.
> 
> Thanks for testing.
> 
> Can I add a tested-by tag for you for those patches?

Of course.

Tested-by: Nathan Lynch <nathan_lynch@...tor.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html