[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B363D1.20707@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 09:43:45 +0800
From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
"Patrick McHardy" <kaber@...sh.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] igmp: fix the problem when mc leave group
On 2014/6/30 19:52, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> The problem was triggered by these steps:
>>
>> 1) create socket, bind and then setsockopt for add mc group.
>> mreq.imr_multiaddr.s_addr = inet_addr("255.0.0.37");
>> mreq.imr_interface.s_addr = inet_addr("192.168.1.2");
>> setsockopt(sockfd, IPPROTO_IP, IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP, &mreq, sizeof(mreq));
>>
>> 2) drop the mc group for this socket.
>> mreq.imr_multiaddr.s_addr = inet_addr("255.0.0.37");
>> mreq.imr_interface.s_addr = inet_addr("0.0.0.0");
>> setsockopt(sockfd, IPPROTO_IP, IP_DROP_MEMBERSHIP, &mreq, sizeof(mreq));
>>
>> 3) and then drop the socket, I found the mc group was still used by the dev:
>>
>> netstat -g
>>
>> Interface RefCnt Group
>> --------------- ------ ---------------------
>> eth2 1 255.0.0.37
>>
>> Normally even though the IP_DROP_MEMBERSHIP return error, the mc group still need
>> to be released for the netdev when drop the socket, but this process was broken when
>> route default is NULL, the reason is that:
>>
>> The ip_mc_leave_group() will choose the in_dev by the imr_interface.s_addr, if input addr
>> is NULL, the default route dev will be chosen, then the ifindex is got from the dev,
>> then polling the inet->mc_list and return -ENODEV, but if the default route dev is NULL,
>> the in_dev and ifIndex is both NULL, when polling the inet->mc_list, the mc group will be
>> released from the mc_list, but the dev didn't dec the refcnt for this mc group, so
>> when dropping the socket, the mc_list is NULL and the dev still keep this group.
>>
>> Fix this by checking the ifindex when polling the mc_list in ip_mc_leave_group(), don't
>> release the mc group from the inet->mc_list if the index is 0, leave this work to
>> ip_mc_drop_socket().
>>
>
> No, we should make it aligned with IPv6 (RFC3493) and BSDs,
> so...
>
Ok, I will check it and then think about this problem.
>> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> net/ipv4/igmp.c | 5 ++---
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
>> index 6748d42..03e0629 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
>> @@ -1950,10 +1950,9 @@ int ip_mc_leave_group(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mreqn *imr)
>> imlp = &iml->next_rcu) {
>> if (iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr != group)
>> continue;
>> - if (ifindex) {
>> - if (iml->multi.imr_ifindex != ifindex)
>> + if (ifindex || iml->multi.imr_ifindex != ifindex)
>
> ifindex && iml->multi.imr_ifindex != ifindex
>
yes, my solution looks get another problem, thanks for your advise, I will fix it.
Ding
>> continue;
>
> Fix indentation.
>
>> - } else if (imr->imr_address.s_addr && imr->imr_address.s_addr !=
>> + else if (imr->imr_address.s_addr && imr->imr_address.s_addr !=
>> iml->multi.imr_address.s_addr)
>> continue;
>>
>>
>
> Regarads,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists