[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140704193644.GB2343@t520.home>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 16:36:44 -0300
From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: Re: RSS is not efficient when forwarding (ixgbe)
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 07:44:08PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a simple router setup which forwards traffic from
> one ixgbe 82599ES to another ixgbe of the same model.
>
> kernel: 3.16.0-rc2-00262-ga921e2a
>
> p2p1: 192.168.155.1/24 is the gateway of the LAN
> p2p2: 192.168.156.1/24 is the gateway of the other LAN
>
> While the ARP is resolving, I can see the packets being spread
> among all the 8 queues (8 online CPUs) available and that is fine.
>
> However, as soon as the TCP traffic starts, all streams are
> merged to rx-queue-0 which overwhelms one single CPU, so the
> total throughput is about 4Gbits/sec.
>
> I can see the driver sending different skb->hash for each stream,
> so it can't be the NIC.
>
> Also, if I run a local http on the router, the skb->hash pattern
> doesn't change, but the workload is spread among all CPUs.
>
> debug output while reproducing all the streams on rx-queue-0:
> [...]
> [11685.885093] ixgbe_rx_skb:1713 skb(ffff880222a77200) hash: 0xC2AF4A27
> [11685.891454] ixgbe_rx_skb:1713 skb(ffff880222a77200) hash: 0x8C5B749D
> [11685.897820] ixgbe_rx_skb:1713 skb(ffff880222a77200) hash: 0xA33BA6D5
> [11690.845032] net_ratelimit: 3276406 callbacks suppressed
> [...]
The command 'ehtool -S p2p1 | grep rx_queue' shows only rx queue #0
receiving packets. Also, /proc/interrupts shows only p2p1-TxRx-0
generating interrupts.
Nothing changes when I start irqbalance in the middle of the test.
However, if I create new streams, they are correctly distributed
among the NIC queues/irqs/CPUs.
I have tried the same setup and test with another card (bnx2, 1GbE)
and all queues got traffic by default though they were all assigned
to CPU#0 (no irqbalance), so this is expected and makes me think
this is specific to the ixgbe driver.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
fbl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists