netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] declance: Fix 64-bit compilation warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1404576420.6384.41.camel@joe-AO725>
Date:	Sat, 05 Jul 2014 09:07:00 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] declance: Fix 64-bit compilation warnings

On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 15:56 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>  One question though, does either of you or anybody else know why we're 
> inconsistent about this 0x prefixing of virtual addresses vs physical 
> addresses?  Specifically %p vs e.g. %pad.

I think it's a mistake and I agree.

I submitted a patch to remove the prefix from %pad.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/21/333


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html