[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 14:08:57 -0700
From: Chad Reese <kreese@...ium.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Chad Reese <kreese@...iumnetworks.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] net-timestamp: explicit SO_TIMESTAMPING
ancillary data struct
On 07/07/2014 01:18 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:44:44PM -0700, Chad Reese wrote:
>>
>> For Octeon, you can optionally use the hardware timestamp as the
>> system clock reference. Most people don't, but it is the only way to
>> get the system time to be accurate. 1588 can synchronize two Octeon
>> boards to less than 1ns for the hardware timer. The Linux software
>> timers is always farther off.
>
> Did you mean 1us ?
No, it was 1ns. Who would go through all this effort if all you wanted
was 1us? Our requirement was within 20ns, but me managed to get 1ns
with a lab setup. We had to be careful that the scope probes used in the
measurement were the same length.
Chad
--
Chad Reese <kreese@...ium.com>
Cavium Networks
Phone: 408 - 943 - 7183
Cell: 321 - 438 - 7753
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists