[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140710151904.GA5283@arch.cereza>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 12:19:04 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ethernet: Add new driver for Marvell Armada 375
network unit
On 08 Jul 12:18 AM, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com> :
> [...]
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..21931a1
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2.c
> [...]
> > +static inline void mvpp2_mib_counters_clear(struct mvpp2_port *pp)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + u32 dummy;
> > +
> > + /* Perform dummy reads from MIB counters */
> > + for (i = 0; i < MVPP2_MIB_LATE_COLLISION; i += 4)
> > + dummy = readl(pp->pp2->lms_base +
> > + (MVPP2_MIB_COUNTERS_BASE(pp->id) + i));
> ^ excess parenthesis
>
> Please reduce the scope of the dummy variable and add curly braces in the
> (multi-line) "for" block.
>
> You may remove the "Perform dummy ..." comment. The code is literate enough.
>
Actually, the dummy variable is not needed: a plain readl() is enough.
> [...]
> > +/* Update lookup field in tcam sw entry */
> > +static void mvpp2_prs_tcam_lu_set(struct mvpp2_prs_entry *pe, unsigned int lu)
> > +{
> > + pe->tcam.byte[MVPP2_PRS_TCAM_LU_BYTE] = lu;
> > + pe->tcam.byte[MVPP2_PRS_TCAM_EN_OFFS(MVPP2_PRS_TCAM_LU_BYTE)] =
> > + MVPP2_PRS_LU_MASK;
>
> Use a local u8 *b = pe->tcam.byte; ?
>
I think keeping the pe->tcam.byte, but using a local for the
MVPP2_PRS_TCAM_EN_OFFS(MVPP2_PRS_TCAM_LU_BYTE) should be more readable.
I've gone through similar patterns and fixed this.
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Update mask for single port in tcam sw entry */
> > +static void mvpp2_prs_tcam_port_set(struct mvpp2_prs_entry *pe,
> > + unsigned int port, bool add)
> > +{
> > + if (add)
> > + pe->tcam.byte[MVPP2_PRS_TCAM_EN_OFFS(MVPP2_PRS_TCAM_PORT_BYTE)]
> > + &= ~(1 << port);
> > + else
> > + pe->tcam.byte[MVPP2_PRS_TCAM_EN_OFFS(MVPP2_PRS_TCAM_PORT_BYTE)]
> > + |= (1 << port);
>
> Use a local u8 *b = pe->tcam.byte; ?
>
Ditto, using a local for the array should be readable enough.
> [...]
> > +/* Compare tcam data bytes with a pattern */
> > +static bool mvpp2_prs_tcam_data_cmp(struct mvpp2_prs_entry *pe,
> > + unsigned int offs, unsigned int size,
> > + unsigned char *bytes)
> > +{
> > + unsigned char byte, mask;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> > + mvpp2_prs_tcam_data_byte_get(pe, offs + i, &byte, &mask);
> > +
> > + if (byte != bytes[i])
> > + return false;
>
> Please reduce the scope of "byte" and "mask".
>
Agreed. This applies on several other places, I'll fix them all.
> > + }
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Update ai bits in tcam sw entry */
> > +static void mvpp2_prs_tcam_ai_update(struct mvpp2_prs_entry *pe,
> > + unsigned int bits, unsigned int enable)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < MVPP2_PRS_AI_BITS; i++)
> > + if (enable & BIT(i)) {
> > + if (bits & BIT(i))
> > + pe->tcam.byte[MVPP2_PRS_TCAM_AI_BYTE] |=
> > + (1 << i);
> > + else
> > + pe->tcam.byte[MVPP2_PRS_TCAM_AI_BYTE] &=
> > + ~(1 << i);
> > + }
>
> Curly braces for the "for" loop + local variable for &pe->tcam.byte[foo]
>
As you suggest below: I'll fix the comparison to recover the indent, use a local
for the array index, and add curly braces.
> [...]
> > +/* Update ri bits in sram sw entry */
> > +static void mvpp2_prs_sram_ri_update(struct mvpp2_prs_entry *pe,
> > + unsigned int bits, unsigned int mask)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < MVPP2_PRS_SRAM_RI_CTRL_BITS; i++)
>
> Please add curly braces.
>
Sure.
> > + if (mask & BIT(i)) {
>
> Invert the test and add a "continue" statement to recover the missing indent
> level ?
>
Agreed. The same applies on other places.
[..]
> > +/* Return first free tcam index, seeking from start to end */
> > +static int mvpp2_prs_tcam_first_free(struct mvpp2 *pp2, unsigned char start,
> > + unsigned char end)
> > +{
> > + int tid;
> > + bool found = false;
> > +
> > + if (start > end)
> > + swap(start, end);
> > +
> > + for (tid = start; tid <= end; tid++) {
> > + if (!pp2->prs_shadow[tid].valid) {
> > + found = true;
> > + break;
>
> Don't break: test for tid < MVPP2_PRS_TCAM_SRAM_SIZE and return.
>
Yes, this function can be reworked altogether to trim "end" to the size
and remove the "found" variable.
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (found && (tid < MVPP2_PRS_TCAM_SRAM_SIZE))
> > + return tid;
> > + return -EINVAL;
> [...]
> > +static void mvpp2_prs_mac_all_multi_set(struct mvpp2 *pp2, int port, bool add)
> > +{
> > + struct mvpp2_prs_entry pe;
> > + unsigned int index = 0;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + /* Ethernet multicast address first byte is
> > + * 0x01 for IPv4 and 0x33 for IPv6
> > + */
> > + unsigned char da_mc[MVPP2_PRS_MAX_MAC_MC] = { 0x01, 0x33 };
> > +
> > + for (i = MVPP2_PRS_IP4_MAC_MC; i < MVPP2_PRS_MAX_MAC_MC; i++) {
> > + if (i == MVPP2_PRS_IP4_MAC_MC)
> > + index = MVPP2_PE_MAC_MC_ALL;
> > + else
> > + index = MVPP2_PE_MAC_MC_IP6;
>
> Ternary ?
>
Sure.
[..]
> > +static struct mvpp2_prs_entry *mvpp2_prs_vlan_find(struct mvpp2 *pp2,
> > + unsigned short tpid, int ai)
> > +{
> > + struct mvpp2_prs_entry *pe;
> > + unsigned int ri_bits, ai_bits;
> > + unsigned int enable;
> > + unsigned char tpid_arr[2];
> > + int tid;
>
> Nitnit: please xmas-treefy (wherever possible).
>
OK.
> > +/* Search for existing double vlan entry */
> > +static struct mvpp2_prs_entry *mvpp2_prs_double_vlan_find(struct mvpp2 *pp2,
> > + unsigned short tpid1,
> > + unsigned short tpid2)
> > +{
> > + struct mvpp2_prs_entry *pe;
> > + unsigned int enable, bits;
>
> Excess scope.
>
> > + unsigned char tpid_arr1[2];
> > + unsigned char tpid_arr2[2];
>
> unsigned char tpid[2][2] ?
>
Yeah, this function needs some love.
So, I have fixed all the excess parenthesis, excess scope, missing curly braces,
added ternary uses and did many other style clean-ups, based on your feedback.
In addition, removed the Tx/Rx module parameters and instead using the default
values (which are fixed by the hardware).
Thanks for such detailed review. I'll submit v4 shortly.
--
Ezequiel GarcĂa, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists