[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140711212811.GG13525@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 22:28:11 +0100
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, therbert@...gle.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, pshelar@...ira.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
dborkman@...hat.com,
"Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth)" <pritkoth@...co.com>,
Madhu Challa <challa@...ronetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] vxlan: Be liberal on receive and only
require the I bit to be set
On 07/11/14 at 12:41pm, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:59:49 +0200
> Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
>
> > @@ -1617,7 +1646,9 @@ static int vxlan6_xmit_skb(struct vxlan_sock *vs,
> > }
> >
> > vxh = (struct vxlanhdr *) __skb_push(skb, sizeof(*vxh));
> > - vxh->vx_flags = htonl(VXLAN_FLAGS);
> > + vxlan_flags(vxh) = VXLAN_FLAG_VNI;
> > + vxh->vx_reserved1 = 0;
> > + vxh->vx_reserved2 = 0;
> > vxh->vx_vni = vni;
> >
>
> Okay, but initializing bitfields generates crappy code.
> Can we just alias and do one assignment.
Sure, I'll resend.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists