netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] vxlan: Be liberal on receive and only require the I bit to be set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:18:01 +0200
From:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
CC:	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	"Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth)" <pritkoth@...co.com>,
	Madhu Challa <challa@...ronetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] vxlan: Be liberal on receive and only require
 the I bit to be set

Le 14/07/2014 10:18, Thomas Graf a écrit :
> On 07/13/14 at 03:08pm, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
>>> The VXLAN receive code is currently conservative in what it accepts and
>>> will reject any frame that uses any of the reserved fields. The VXLAN
>>> draft specifies that "reserved fields MUST be set to zero on transmit
>>> and ignored on receive." though.
>>>
>>> Be liberal in only requiring the I bit to allow for VXLAN extensions
>>> to be implemented.
>>>
>> This is not robust (this is a problem in the VXLAN spec not your
>> patch). There is no requirement that the VXLAN bits are optional. For
>> example, if a receiver accepts a GPE packet but doesn't implement it
>> the packet will be misinterpreted. I've already pointed this out to
>> the VLXAN folks on nvo3 list. Dropping packets with unknown bits set
>> is the only sane approach.
>
> I agree, it's a mess.
+1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html