[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140715103858.GD28235@mikrodark.usersys.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:38:58 +0200
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] bonding: add proper __rcu annotation for
curr_active_slave
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 02:46:44AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>RCU was added to bonding in linux-3.12 but lacked proper sparse annotations.
>
>Using __rcu annotation actually helps to spot all accesses to bond->curr_active_slave
>are correctly protected, with LOCKDEP support.
>
>Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Thanks a lot for cleaning this up, it's really a huge mess here...
One question though:
...snip...
>@@ -2046,7 +2051,7 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
> bond_alb_handle_link_change(bond, slave,
> BOND_LINK_DOWN);
>
>- if (slave == bond->curr_active_slave)
>+ if (slave == rcu_access_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave))
I guess you've meant rtnl_dereference()? As bond_miimon_commit() is ujnder
rtnl, not under rcu.
> goto do_failover;
>
> continue;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists