[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C50897.2020605@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:55:19 +0200
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] bonding: rcu cleanups
On 07/15/2014 11:46 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> RCU was added to bonding in linux-3.12 but lacked proper sparse annotations.
>
> Using __rcu annotation actually helps to spot all accesses to bond->curr_active_slave
> are correctly protected, with full sparse & LOCKDEP support.
>
> Lets clean the code.
>
> Eric Dumazet (3):
> bonding: get rid of bond_option_active_slave_get()
> bonding: use rcu_access_pointer() in bonding_show_mii_status()
> bonding: add proper __rcu annotation for curr_active_slave
>
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c | 21 +++++++++++----
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c | 7 +----
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 7 +++--
> 6 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
Nice clean up, I also gave it a quick run. I believe similar clean up would
be beneficial for current_arp_slave at some point.
Anyhow, thanks Eric!
For the set
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists