[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGa1Tm5+ZiNuuYVmjWRh5i069m8hWL0aXRDjjP=3dd0p5hWFXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:48:20 -0400
From: David Held <drheld@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] udp: Use hash2 for long hash1 chains in __udp*_lib_mcast_deliver.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 18:30 -0400, David Held wrote:
>> Many multicast sources can have the same port which can result in a very
>> large list when hashing by port only. Hash by address and port instead
>> if this is the case. This makes multicast more similar to unicast.
>>
>> On a 24-core machine receiving from 500 multicast sockets on the same
>> port, before this patch 80% of system CPU was used up by spin locking
>> and only ~25% of packets were successfully delivered.
>>
>> With this patch, all packets are delivered and kernel overhead is ~8%
>> system CPU on spinlocks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Held <drheld@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/sock.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> net/ipv4/udp.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> net/ipv6/udp.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
>> index cb84b2f..6734cab 100644
>> --- a/include/net/sock.h
>> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
>> @@ -660,6 +660,20 @@ static inline void sk_add_bind_node(struct sock *sk,
>> #define sk_for_each_bound(__sk, list) \
>> hlist_for_each_entry(__sk, list, sk_bind_node)
>>
>> +/**
>> + * sk_nulls_for_each_entry_offset - iterate over a list at a given struct offset
>> + * @tpos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
>> + * @pos: the &struct hlist_node to use as a loop cursor.
>> + * @head: the head for your list.
>> + * @offset: offset of hlist_node within the struct.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +#define sk_nulls_for_each_entry_offset(tpos, pos, head, offset) \
>> + for (pos = (head)->first; \
>> + (!is_a_nulls(pos)) && \
>> + ({ tpos = (typeof(*tpos) *)((void *)pos - offset); 1;}); \
>> + pos = pos->next)
>> +
>> static inline struct user_namespace *sk_user_ns(struct sock *sk)
>> {
>> /* Careful only use this in a context where these parameters
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
>> index 8089ba2..b023a36 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
>> @@ -1616,6 +1616,8 @@ static void flush_stack(struct sock **stack, unsigned int count,
>>
>> if (skb1 && udp_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb1) <= 0)
>> skb1 = NULL;
>> +
>> + sock_put(sk);
>> }
>> if (unlikely(skb1))
>> kfree_skb(skb1);
>> @@ -1648,37 +1650,45 @@ static int __udp4_lib_mcast_deliver(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> unsigned short hnum = ntohs(uh->dest);
>> struct udp_hslot *hslot = udp_hashslot(udptable, net, hnum);
>> int dif = skb->dev->ifindex;
>> - unsigned int i, count = 0;
>> + unsigned int count = 0, offset = offsetof(typeof(*sk), sk_nulls_node);
>> + unsigned int hash2 = 0, hash2_any = 0, use_hash2 = (hslot->count > 10);
>> +
> Not sure why hash2 and hash2_any are set to 0 here ?
It shouldn't be needed, but there's a spurious compiler warning
otherwise as the compiler isn't smart enough to know that the second
use_hash2 implies that they will have been set.
>
>> + if (use_hash2) {
>> + hash2_any = udp4_portaddr_hash(net, htonl(INADDR_ANY), hnum);
>> + hash2 = udp4_portaddr_hash(net, daddr, hnum);
>
> you probably could AND the mask here
> hash2_any = udp4_portaddr_hash(net, htonl(INADDR_ANY), hnum) & udp_table.mask;
> hash2 = udp4_portaddr_hash(net, daddr, hnum) & udp_table.mask;
Sounds good. That solves the issue you identified below.
>> +start_lookup:
>> + hslot = &udp_table.hash2[hash2 & udp_table.mask];
>> + offset = offsetof(typeof(*sk), __sk_common.skc_portaddr_node);
>> + }
>>
>> spin_lock(&hslot->lock);
>> - sk_nulls_for_each(sk, node, &hslot->head) {
>> + sk_nulls_for_each_entry_offset(sk, node, &hslot->head, offset) {
>> if (__udp_is_mcast_sock(net, sk,
>> uh->dest, daddr,
>> uh->source, saddr,
>> dif, hnum)) {
>> stack[count++] = sk;
>> + sock_hold(sk);
>> if (unlikely(count == ARRAY_SIZE(stack))) {
>> flush_stack(stack, count, skb, ~0);
>> count = 0;
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> - /*
>> - * before releasing chain lock, we must take a reference on sockets
>> - */
>> - for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
>> - sock_hold(stack[i]);
>>
>> spin_unlock(&hslot->lock);
>>
>> + /* Also lookup *:port if we are using hash2 and haven't done so yet. */
>> + if (use_hash2 && hash2 != hash2_any) {
>
> The thing that really matters here is not hash2 != hash2_any, but that
> the hash bucket (after masking hash2 with udp_table.mask) is the same or
> not.
>
> If the test is not properly done here, we are doing to deliver two
> copies of each packet to each socket.
You're right. Thanks for spotting that! Will update.
>> + hash2 = hash2_any;
>> + goto start_lookup;
>> + }
>> +
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists