netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: ppp: fix creating PPP pass and active filters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140716.124030.250979094438378500.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	develop@...stov.de
Cc:	alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, dborkman@...hat.com,
	varkabhadram@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org, isdn@...ux-pingi.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: ppp: fix creating PPP pass and active
 filters

From: Christoph Schulz <develop@...stov.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:47:55 +0200

> Hello!
> 
> Alexei Starovoitov schrieb am Tue, 15 Jul 2014 08:38:58 -0700:
> 
>>> Well, this is a soft-limit, and in this particular circumstance
>>> it should be fine to use your original proposal. I don't see how
>>> Varka's suggestions make this better in _any way_, rather the
>>> very opposite.
>>
>> +1
> 
> Fine. So I need not change anything, right? How can I change (or
> trigger changing) the patch's state from "Changes Requested" to "Under
> Review" again without resubmitting it without any modifications? Or
> will that happen eventually anyway after some time has elapsed?

Please just submit the patch again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html