[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1405547523.10255.61.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:52:03 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] bonding: Do not try to send packets over dead link in
TLB mode.
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 11:10 -0700, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
> In TLB mode if tlb_dynamic_lb is NOT set, slaves from the bond
> group are selected based on the hash distribution. This does not
> exclude dead links which are part of the bond. Also if there is a
> temporary link event which brings down the interface, packets
> hashed on that interface would be dropped too.
>
> This patch fixes these issues and distributes flows across the
> UP links only. Also the array construction of links which are
> capable of sending packets happen in the control path leaving
> only link-selection during the data-path.
>
> One possible side effect of this is - at a link event; all
> flows will be shuffled to get good distribution. But impact of
> this should be minimum with the assumption that a member or
> members of the bond group are not available is a very temporary
> situation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
> ---
OK, this one seems fine, thanks ;)
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
This is for net-next tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists