netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] sfc: add extra RX drop counters for nodesc_trunc and noskb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140715.225356.2046608141773950507.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ecree@...arflare.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sfc: add extra RX drop counters for
 nodesc_trunc and noskb_drop

From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:58:12 +0100

> Added a counter rx_noskb_drop for failure to allocate an skb.
> Summed the per-channel rx_nodesc_trunc counters earlier so that they can
>  be included in rx_dropped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
> ---
> Tested that new stats appear in ethtool -S.
> However, because of the way the GENERIC_STATs are defined, they appear
>  at the top of the output.  Does the order of stats matter?

I don't think the order matters.

Applied, thanks Edward.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html