netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/4] xen-netback: Fix handling frag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140718152435.GN7142@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:24:35 +0100
From:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To:	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
CC:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/4] xen-netback: Fix handling frag_list on grant op
 error path

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 08:09:49PM +0100, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> The error handling for skb's with frag_list was completely wrong, it caused
> double unmap attempts to happen if the error was on the first skb. Move it to
> the right place in the loop.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
> Reported-by: Armin Zentai <armin.zentai@...t.hu>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> index 1844a47..604ff71 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -1030,10 +1030,16 @@ static int xenvif_tx_check_gop(struct xenvif_queue *queue,
>  {
>  	struct gnttab_map_grant_ref *gop_map = *gopp_map;
>  	u16 pending_idx = XENVIF_TX_CB(skb)->pending_idx;
> +	/* This points to the shinfo of the actually checked skb, which could be
> +	 * either the first or the one on the frag_list
> +	 */

I think "checked skb" should be "skb being checked". Feel free to
disagree as I'm not native English speaker. :-/

>  	struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
> +	/* If this is non-NULL, we are currently checking the frag_list skb, and
> +	 * this points to the shinfo of the first one
> +	 */
> +	struct skb_shared_info *first_shinfo = NULL;
>  	int nr_frags = shinfo->nr_frags;
>  	int i, err;
> -	struct sk_buff *first_skb = NULL;
>  
>  	/* Check status of header. */
>  	err = (*gopp_copy)->status;
> @@ -1086,31 +1092,28 @@ check_frags:
>  			xenvif_idx_unmap(queue, pending_idx);
>  		}
>  
> +		/* And if we found the error while checking the frag_list, unmap
> +		 * the first skb's frags
> +		 */
> +		if (first_shinfo) {
> +			for (j = 0; j < first_shinfo->nr_frags; j++) {
> +				pending_idx = frag_get_pending_idx(&first_shinfo->frags[j]);
> +				xenvif_idx_unmap(queue, pending_idx);
> +			}
> +		}
> +
>  		/* Remember the error: invalidate all subsequent fragments. */
>  		err = newerr;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (skb_has_frag_list(skb)) {
> -		first_skb = skb;
> -		skb = shinfo->frag_list;
> -		shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
> +	if (skb_has_frag_list(skb) && !first_shinfo) {

Will it ever come to the point that we have another skb in this skb's
frag list? Is there any reason prevents you from looping over the
(possible) subsequent skbs? I guess if the error is deep in the list
it's a bit hard to bookkeep...

> +		first_shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
> +		shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list);

In that case I would suggest you add
BUG_ON(skb_has_frag_list(skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list)). I think having
more nested frag_list should be a bug in current design.

Wei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html