lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 19 Jul 2014 01:12:40 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, brouer@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Measurable performance improvements from RCU_INIT_POINTER()?

Hello!

Did the replacement of selected calls to rcu_assign_pointer() by
RCU_INIT_POINTER() in the networking stack result in measurable
system-level performance improvements?

The reason I ask is that some of the compiler guys on the C and C++
standards committees are suggesting changes that would add barriers
in some cases.  I suspect that this is a very bad idea, and was hoping
that you guys would have some hard numbers on the system-level effects
of barriers.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ