lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:08:45 +0200
From:	Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...n-mesh.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	davem@...emloft.net
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] skbedit: allow the user to specify bitmask for mark



On 21/07/14 14:04, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/sched/act_skbedit.c b/net/sched/act_skbedit.c
>> index fcfeeaf..5fca32b 100644
>> --- a/net/sched/act_skbedit.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/act_skbedit.c
>> @@ -43,8 +43,12 @@ static int tcf_skbedit(struct sk_buff *skb, const
>> struct tc_action *a,
>>       if (d->flags & SKBEDIT_F_QUEUE_MAPPING &&
>>           skb->dev->real_num_tx_queues > d->queue_mapping)
>>           skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, d->queue_mapping);
>> -    if (d->flags & SKBEDIT_F_MARK)
>> -        skb->mark = d->mark;
>> +    if (d->flags & SKBEDIT_F_MARK) {
>> +        /* unset all the bits in the mask */
>> +        skb->mark = skb->mark & ~d->mask;
> 
>    Why not 'skb->mark &= ~d->mask;'?


No real reason :) Shall we always use the compressed version of this
operator when possible ?


-- 
Antonio Quartulli


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (885 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ