netdev - Re: [PATCH/RFC] net: Don't save mid batch datagram processing error for next recvmmsg call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:24:10 -0300
From:	'Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo' <acme@...nel.org>
To:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Networking Development Mailing List 
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Caitlin Bestler <caitlin.bestler@...il.com>,
	Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...driver.com>,
	Elie De Brauwer <eliedebrauwer@...il.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
	Ondřej Bílka <neleai@...nam.cz>,
	Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
	Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@...lab.net>,
	Steven Whitehouse <steve@...gwyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] net: Don't save mid batch datagram processing error
 for next recvmmsg call

Em Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 08:33:27AM +0000, David Laight escreveu:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
> > 	I think this addresses the problems reported by David Laight and
> > others, where errors saved on a per socket area could be delivered to a
> > different thread, so I just followed David Laight's suggestion and
> > stopped saving it, we'll return it only if it happens for the first
> > datagram, else we return less entries than asked for.

> > 	Steven, IIRC you was the one that suggested using this
> > mechanism, no? Do you have anything against this move?
 
> +	return datagrams ?: err;
 
> Inline patches, don't attach them.

Oh well, ok, will do next time.
 
> Don't use non-C constructs.

We use it in many places, one could say the kernel isn't written in C
anyway:

[acme@zoo linux]$ find . -name "*.[ch]" | xargs grep '?:' | cut -d'/' -f -2 | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
    189 ./drivers
     45 ./arch
     33 ./crypto
     30 ./fs
     25 ./net
     23 ./kernel
     22 ./tools
      9 ./sound
      8 ./include
      5 ./security
      5 ./mm
      3 ./block
      2 ./lib
      1 ./scripts
      1 ./ipc
[acme@zoo linux]$

Other than that, are you ok with the change?

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html