lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 18:59:36 +0400 From: Dmitry Krivenok <krivenok.dmitry@...il.com> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org Cc: willy@...a-x.org, const-g@...rt.com, girouard@...ibm.com, ctindel@...e.org, mitch.a.williams@...el.com Subject: Question about 802.3ad bonding mode. Hello, I have two physical NICs bonded into bond0 interface with bonding mode=4 (i,e, 802.3ad). Both NICs are connected to the same switch and switch ports are *not* configured in "lacp" mode. Documentation on this mode says this: The 802.3ad mode requires that the switch have the appropriate ports configured as an 802.3ad aggregation. The precise method used to configure this varies from switch to switch, but, for example, a Cisco 3550 series switch requires that the appropriate ports first be grouped together in a single etherchannel instance, then that etherchannel is set to mode "lacp" to enable 802.3ad (instead of standard EtherChannel). I'd expect that in such a case LAG should not be created via LACP. And it's actually not created because I see the following LACPDUs coming out of my NICs every 30 seconds: 13:27:25.968094 LACPv1, length: 110 Actor Information TLV (0x01), length: 20 System 00:60:16:56:ab:c1, System Priority 65535, Key 17, Port 1, Port Priority 255 State Flags [Activity, Aggregation, Synchronization, Default] Partner Information TLV (0x02), length: 20 System 00:00:00:00:00:00, System Priority 65535, Key 1, Port 1, Port Priority 255 State Flags [Activity] Collector Information TLV (0x03), length: 16 Max Delay 0 Terminator TLV (0x00), length: 0 AFAIK state flag "Default" means that we never got any LACPDUs from the switch. I have IP address configured on bond0 and from what I see it's fully working. I can ping it from various hosts, I can ssh to that host, etc. From user perspective it works just fine except that there is no LAG... Is that correct behavior of dynamic link aggregation via LACP? Shouldn't it be configuration error? Is it 802.1ax compliant? Any help is very appreciated. Thanks, Dmitry P.S. My host is SLES11SP2, kernel 3.0. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists