lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 18:52:48 +0200 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com> To: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>, "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>, Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>, Pierre Fersing <pierre-fersing@...rref.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.de>, Nagalakshmi Nandigama <nagalakshmi.nandigama@...gotech.com>, Praveen Krishnamoorthy <praveen.krishnamoorthy@...gotech.com>, Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...gotech.com>, Abhijit Mahajan <abhijit.mahajan@...gotech.com>, Hariprasad S <hariprasad@...lsio.com>, Santosh Rastapur <santosh@...lsio.com>, "MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...gotech.com" <MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...gotech.com>, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] driver core: enable drivers to use deferred probe from init On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 03:46:32PM +0000, Yuval Mintz wrote: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] driver core: enable drivers to use deferred probe from > > init > > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 03:12:11PM +0000, Yuval Mintz wrote: > > > Perhaps this is a silly question, but what guarantees that the > > > deferred probe list will actually be triggered, e.g., in case the > > > delayed device is the last device in the system? > > > > The dev->init_delayed_probe is used to ensure that we'd add the device to the > > deferred probe list once making this a per device thing if the driver has the field > > delay_probe set to true. This technically also allows this to be a per device thing > > so with some more work we could enable drivers to only enable this for specific > > devices but at this point this did not seem required. > > Sorry for not being clear, but I didn't meant 'what guarantees that the device > will be added to the deferred probe', but rather what guarantees that the > deferred workqueue will be scheduled. > > To the best of my knowledge the deferring mechanism works only if one device > is dependent upon another, e.g., for Multi-function devices where one device > probe is dependent upon the others - which are soon-to-be probed. The workqueue will be kicked when driver_deferred_probe_trigger() gets poked, we do that in the late_initcall(deferred_probe_initcall), it also gets flushed there with a flush_workqueue(deferred_wq). Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists