netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] netfilter: xt_bpf: don't include linux/filter.h from uapi header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Jul 2014 18:05:49 +0200
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Cc:	netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>, keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] netfilter: xt_bpf: don't include
 linux/filter.h from uapi header

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:43:57AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > In e6f30c7 ("netfilter: x_tables: add xt_bpf match"), the internal
> > linux/filter.h header slipped through in the user exposed xt_bpf.h
> > header as included file.
> 
> is that true? #include <linux/filter.h> should include
> include/uapi/linux/filter.h in userspace builds.

You're right. I'm going to send a v2.

We should also cache the linux/filter.h header in the iptables
sources, would you send a patch for that? Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html