lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:05:01 -0700 From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> To: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>, carlos@...hat.com Cc: eblake@...hat.com, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org> Subject: linux/if_bridge.h no longer self contained (again) Hi all, Gregory and I bumped into the following issue: http://linux-kernel.2935.n7.nabble.com/if-bridge-h-include-in6-h-for-struct-in6-addr-use-td580828.html also reported here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895141 We tracked down the following Linux changes: ee262ad827f89e2dc7851ec2986953b5b125c6bc inet: defines IPPROTO_* needed for module alias generation cfd280c91253cc28e4919e349fa7a813b63e71e8 net: sync some IP headers with glibc and the following glibc change: 6c82a2f8d7c8e21e39237225c819f182ae438db3 Coordinate IPv6 definitions for Linux and glibc but as far as we could see and test it, this particular issue is still present in the current Linux kernel. What would be the recommended ways to move forward? Should we keep a local change that includes netinet/in6.h and just hope it does not cause any re-definitions? Thanks! -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists