netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: use kobject_put instead of _del after kobject

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140731104601.GA4373@mikrodark.usersys.redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:46:01 +0200
From:	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: use kobject_put instead of _del after
 kobject_add

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:37:43PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
>Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:27:43 +0200
>
>> Otherwise the name of the kobject isn't getting freed and other stuff from
>> kobject_cleanup() isn't getting called. kobject_put() will call
>> kobject_del() on its own in kobject_cleanup().
>>
>> CC: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>
>> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
>
>Introduced in v3.14, so maybe steer this to 'net' instead?

Good idea. Should I re-send it or can you just apply it to net?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html