lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dborkman@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, hannes@...essinduktion.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] random32: improvements to prandom_bytes

From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:11:16 +0200

> -		for (j = 0; j < sizeof(u32); j++) {
> -			p[i + j] = random;
> -			random >>= BITS_PER_BYTE;
> -		}
> +	while (bytes > sizeof(u32)) {
> +		put_unaligned(prandom_u32_state(state), (u32 *) ptr);
> +		ptr += sizeof(u32);
> +		bytes -= sizeof(u32);
>  	}
> -	if (i < bytes) {
> -		u32 random = prandom_u32_state(state);
>  
> -		for (; i < bytes; i++) {
> -			p[i] = random;
> -			random >>= BITS_PER_BYTE;
> -		}
> +	if (bytes > 0) {
> +		u32 rem = prandom_u32_state(state);
> +		do {
> +			*ptr++ = (u8) rem;
> +			bytes--;
> +			rem >>= BITS_PER_BYTE;
> +		} while (bytes > 0);
>  	}

This conversion to put_unaligned() is not an equivalent depending
upon the endianness of the cpu.

And this means the random value gets distributed differently into
full words than it will into trailing bytes.

Let's just not mess around with this, ok?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ