netdev - Re: [PATCH] Fix e1000e with Intel 82572EI that has no hardware timestamp support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140806191744.GB6611@netboy>
Date:	Wed, 6 Aug 2014 21:17:44 +0200
From:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:	"Koehrer Mathias (ETAS/ESW5)" <mathias.koehrer@...s.com>
Cc:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix e1000e with Intel 82572EI that has no hardware
 timestamp support

On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 02:32:16PM +0000, Koehrer Mathias (ETAS/ESW5) wrote:
> With the Intel 82527EI (driver: e1000e) there is an issue when running 
> the ptpd2 program, that leads to a kernel oops.
> The reason is here that in e1000_xmit_frame() a work queue will be 
> scheduled that has not been initialized in this case.
> The work queue "tx_hwstamp_work" will only be initialized if 
> adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_HW_TIMESTAMP set.
> This check is missing in e1000_xmit_frame().

Why all the ragged lines?  Better to use an editor that knows how to
justify a paragraph, more like this:

With the Intel 82527EI (driver: e1000e) there is an issue when running
the ptpd2 program, that leads to a kernel oops.  The reason is here
that in e1000_xmit_frame() a work queue will be scheduled that has not
been initialized in this case.  The work queue "tx_hwstamp_work" will
only be initialized if adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_HW_TIMESTAMP set.
This check is missing in e1000_xmit_frame().

That not only looks nicer, but it is also more readable.

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html