netdev - Re: [PATCH] Fix e1000e with Intel 82572EI that has no hardware timestamp support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140806193211.GC6611@netboy>
Date:	Wed, 6 Aug 2014 21:32:11 +0200
From:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:	Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc:	"Koehrer Mathias (ETAS/ESW5)" <mathias.koehrer@...s.com>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix e1000e with Intel 82572EI that has no hardware
 timestamp support

On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 03:20:43PM -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
> My question was as follows after reading the thread here is this patch
> good or do I need to edit it
> some more based on the thread and only putting part of the if
> statement in an unlikely statement.

Huh? Are you Mathias Koehrer?

I was only complaining about the formatting of the change log 
comment. As far as the code goes, please see Alexander Duyck's
emails.

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html