[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140812091850.GD6440@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:18:50 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: razya@...ibm.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, GLIKSON@...ibm.com,
ERANRA@...ibm.com, YOSSIKU@...ibm.com, JOELN@...ibm.com,
abel.gordon@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: Add polling mode
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:46:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 21:45:59 +0200
>
> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:30:35AM +0300, Razya Ladelsky wrote:
> ...
> > And, did your tests actually produce 100% load on both host CPUs?
> ...
>
> Michael, please do not quote an entire patch just to ask a one line
> question.
>
> I truly, truly, wish it was simpler in modern email clients to delete
> the unrelated quoted material because I bet when people do this they
> are simply being lazy.
>
> Thank you.
Lazy - mea culpa, though I'm using mutt so it isn't even hard.
The question still stands: the test results are only valid
if CPU was at 100% in all configurations.
This is the reason I generally prefer it when people report
throughput divided by CPU (power would be good too but it still
isn't easy for people to get that number).
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists