[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <39E24692-5690-4B93-81E4-E0FF8D4C9877@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:59:18 -0700
From: Raghuram Kothakota <Raghuram.Kothakota@...cle.com>
To: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] sunvnet: Schedule maybe_tx_wakeup as a tasklet from ldc_rx path
On Aug 13, 2014, at 3:51 AM, Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com> wrote:
> On (08/12/14 21:26), Raghuram Kothakota wrote:
>>
>> We do not consider a peer which couldn't process LDC messages
>> as an offender but just a peer in a broken state. A peer could get
>
> So I was using "offender" in the same way that one typically
> talks about sending ICMP errors for "offending IP packets"
> (nothing pesonal :-)). I dont want to quibble over terminology here.
>
>> From what I read the ldc_disconect() code, it seems like it is reconfiguring
>> the queues, so I assume a reset event would re-enable the communication
>> fine, but I don't know for sure without testing this specific condition.
>
> No such events were generated by the code when I tested it.
The reset event is expected for the peer, if it is not happening
then we probably need to check why.
-Raghuram
>
> I'll send a consolidated reply to the rest of that very long thread
> in a bit.
>
> --Sowmini
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists