[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1408061394.6804.55.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:09:54 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] packet: handle too big packets for PACKET_V3
It looks like PACKET_V3 has no check that a packet can always fit in a
block.
Its trivial with GRO to break the assumption and write into kernel
memory.
[ 840.989881] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging req0
[ 840.997667] IP: [<ffffffff9ed17466>] memcpy+0x6/0x110
[ 841.003314] PGD 2068b067 PUD 20371d3067 PMD 20370e7067 PTE 80000001dd6b2060
[ 841.011120] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 841.016199] Modules linked in: nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_NFLOG nfnetlink_log nfo
[ 841.060739] CPU: 12 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/12 Not tainted 3.16
[ 841.077824] task: ffff880119ad2580 ti: ffff880119ad8000 task.ti: ffff880119ad8000
[ 841.086173] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff9ed17466>] [<ffffffff9ed17466>] memcpy+0x6/0x110
[ 841.094531] RSP: 0018:ffff880fffac3b48 EFLAGS: 00010286
[ 841.100461] RAX: ffff8801dd6b1b9c RBX: 0000000000000a74 RCX: 00000000000000d6
[ 841.108412] RDX: 000000000000053a RSI: ffff880132a769ce RDI: ffff8801dd6b2000
[ 841.116373] RBP: ffff880fffac3bb0 R08: 0000000000000ff0 R09: ffff8801dd6b1b9c
[ 841.124332] R10: ffff8801bb529f00 R11: 000000000000053a R12: 0000000000000ab6
[ 841.132292] R13: ffff880119ad8000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff8801bb529f00
[ 841.140252] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880fffac0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 841.149279] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 841.155689] CR2: ffff8801dd6b2000 CR3: 000000001f40e000 CR4: 00000000001427e0
[ 841.163649] Stack:
[ 841.165888] ffffffff9eed1a15 ffff8801e1d06800 ffff88010000053a 000000000000053a
[ 841.174176] ffff8801dd6b1b9c ffff880100000ff0 ffff880119adbfd8 ffff880132a755b6
[ 841.182466] ffff8801bb529f00 ffff8801e1d06800 000000000000151c ffff880132a755b6
[ 841.190764] Call Trace:
[ 841.193490] <IRQ>
[ 841.195632] [<ffffffff9eed1a15>] ? skb_copy_bits+0x145/0x290
[ 841.202272] [<ffffffff9ef95899>] tpacket_rcv+0x249/0x820
[ 841.208295] [<ffffffff9eee3358>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x388/0x950
[ 841.215578] [<ffffffff9eee30fb>] ? __netif_receive_skb_core+0x12b/0x950
[ 841.223054] [<ffffffff9eee3941>] __netif_receive_skb+0x21/0x70
[ 841.229658] [<ffffffff9eee3b35>] netif_receive_skb+0x25/0x120
[ 841.236166] [<ffffffff9eee3b60>] ? netif_receive_skb+0x50/0x120
[ 841.242869] [<ffffffff9ef67b5e>] ? inet_gro_receive+0x6e/0x290
[ 841.249474] [<ffffffff9eee3d6e>] napi_gro_complete.isra.77+0x13e/0x160
[ 841.256853] [<ffffffff9eee3c60>] ? napi_gro_complete.isra.77+0x30/0x160
[ 841.264331] [<ffffffffc03dc0bd>] ? gro_cell_poll+0x8d/0xd0 [ip_tunnel]
[ 841.271711] [<ffffffff9eee4178>] napi_gro_flush+0x78/0xa0
[ 841.277830] [<ffffffff9eee41d3>] napi_complete+0x33/0x80
[ 841.283852] [<ffffffffc03dc0d4>] gro_cell_poll+0xa4/0xd0 [ip_tunnel]
[ 841.291038] [<ffffffff9eee435a>] net_rx_action+0x13a/0x240
[ 841.297254] [<ffffffff9ea575c0>] __do_softirq+0x100/0x290
[ 841.303374] [<ffffffff9efb1b0c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[ 841.309300] [<ffffffff9ea0bdbd>] do_softirq+0x8d/0xc0
[ 841.315032] [<ffffffff9ea5791d>] irq_exit+0xcd/0xd0
[ 841.320571] [<ffffffff9ea05db3>] do_IRQ+0x63/0xe0
[ 841.325915] [<ffffffff9efa762f>] common_interrupt+0x6f/0x6f
Not sure how to fix this.
This patch only shows where the problem is, but should we :
1) drop the too long packet
2) clamp size to maximal admissible size
3) other solution ? (PACKET_V2 can queue a clone of skb in
receive_queue, but PACKET_V3 has no such capability)
diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index 8d9f8042705a..6ee072b746fb 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -1073,6 +1073,11 @@ static void *__packet_lookup_frame_in_block(struct packet_sock *po,
return (void *)curr;
}
+ /* If frame do not fit on a single block, bail out */
+ if (BLK_PLUS_PRIV(pkc->blk_sizeof_priv) +
+ TOTAL_PKT_LEN_INCL_ALIGN(len) >= pkc->kblk_size)
+ return NULL;
+
/* Ok, close the current block */
prb_retire_current_block(pkc, po, 0);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists