netdev - Re: [PATCH net] vxlan: fix incorrect initializer in union vxlan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53F3B55B.6070505@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Aug 2014 22:36:43 +0200
From:	Gerhard Stenzel <gstenzel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vxlan: fix incorrect initializer in union vxlan_addr

Trying again ... 

On 08/18/2014 07:11 PM, David Miller wrote:
...
> 
> Your patch was corrupted by your email client, also please do not
> indent your signoff.
> 
> THanks.
> 


The first initializer in the following

        union vxlan_addr ipa = {
            .sin.sin_addr.s_addr = tip,
            .sa.sa_family = AF_INET,
        };

is optimised away by the compiler, due to the second initializer,
therefore initialising .sin.sin_addr.s_addr always to 0.
This results in netlink messages indicating a L3 miss never contain the
missed IP address. This was observed with GCC 4.8 and 4.9. I do not know about previous versions.
The problem affects user space programs relying on an IP address being
sent as part of a netlink message indicating a L3 miss.

Changing
            .sa.sa_family = AF_INET,
to
            .sin.sin_family = AF_INET,
fixes the problem.

Signed-off-by: Gerhard Stenzel <gerhard.stenzel@...ibm.com>

--- 

diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
index 1fb7b37..beb377b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -1327,7 +1327,7 @@ static int arp_reduce(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	} else if (vxlan->flags & VXLAN_F_L3MISS) {
 		union vxlan_addr ipa = {
 			.sin.sin_addr.s_addr = tip,
-			.sa.sa_family = AF_INET,
+			.sin.sin_family = AF_INET,
 		};
 
 		vxlan_ip_miss(dev, &ipa);
@@ -1488,7 +1488,7 @@ static int neigh_reduce(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	} else if (vxlan->flags & VXLAN_F_L3MISS) {
 		union vxlan_addr ipa = {
 			.sin6.sin6_addr = msg->target,
-			.sa.sa_family = AF_INET6,
+			.sin6.sin6_family = AF_INET6,
 		};
 
 		vxlan_ip_miss(dev, &ipa);
@@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ static bool route_shortcircuit(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		if (!n && (vxlan->flags & VXLAN_F_L3MISS)) {
 			union vxlan_addr ipa = {
 				.sin.sin_addr.s_addr = pip->daddr,
-				.sa.sa_family = AF_INET,
+				.sin.sin_family = AF_INET,
 			};
 
 			vxlan_ip_miss(dev, &ipa);
@@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ static bool route_shortcircuit(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		if (!n && (vxlan->flags & VXLAN_F_L3MISS)) {
 			union vxlan_addr ipa = {
 				.sin6.sin6_addr = pip6->daddr,
-				.sa.sa_family = AF_INET6,
+				.sin6.sin6_family = AF_INET6,
 			};
 
 			vxlan_ip_miss(dev, &ipa);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html