[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1931285.KsvFbLZH2Q@debian64>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:53:40 +0200
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@...il.com>,
linville@...driver.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] carl9170: Remove redundant protection check
On Friday, August 22, 2014 02:08:52 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 22:38 +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> [...]
> > From: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@...il.com>
> >
> > The carl9170_op_ampdu_action() function is used only by the mac80211
> > framework. Since the mac80211 already takes care of checks and
> > properly serializing calls to the driver's function there is no
> > need for the driver to do the same thing.
> >
> > ---
> > @@ -1430,18 +1430,10 @@ static int carl9170_op_ampdu_action(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> > if (!sta_info->ht_sta)
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> > - rcu_read_lock();
> > - if (rcu_dereference(sta_info->agg[tid])) {
> > - rcu_read_unlock();
> > - return -EBUSY;
> > - }
> > -
> > [...]
> > ---
>
> Sorry but this patch is not complete.
>
> You need to somehow return -EBUSY if sta_info->agg[tid] is set.
The sta_info->agg[tid] check is not needed (for reference, see [0]).
(There is already a check in mac80211 which prevents the leak of
sta_info->agg[tid] [1]).
Regards
Christian
[0] <https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/20/725>
[1] <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c#L583>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists