[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140822130609.GA19576@ada>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:06:09 +0300
From: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@...il.com>
To: stephen@...workplumber.org, davem@...emloft.net,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] br_multicast: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with
RCU_INIT_POINTER()
The use of "rcu_assign_pointer()" is NULLing out the pointer.
According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment:
"1. This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer"
it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a
smaller overhead.
The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
@@
@@
- rcu_assign_pointer
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER
(..., NULL)
Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@...il.com>
---
net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
index abfa0b65..9b64383 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
@@ -1822,7 +1822,7 @@ static void br_multicast_query_expired(struct net_bridge *br,
if (query->startup_sent < br->multicast_startup_query_count)
query->startup_sent++;
- rcu_assign_pointer(querier, NULL);
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(querier, NULL);
br_multicast_send_query(br, NULL, query);
spin_unlock(&br->multicast_lock);
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists