lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:07:10 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
	Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...il.com>
CC:	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [hyperv] BUG at drivers/hv/channel.c:462 while changing MTU

Am 25.08.2014 16:53, schrieb KY Srinivasan:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Richard Weinberger [mailto:richard.weinberger@...il.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 3:48 AM
>> To: Sitsofe Wheeler
>> Cc: Haiyang Zhang; KY Srinivasan; Greg Kroah-Hartman;
>> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Jason Wang;
>> Daniel Borkmann; David S. Miller; netdev@...r.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [hyperv] BUG at drivers/hv/channel.c:462 while changing MTU
>>
>>  via
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...il.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Aug 20 04:04:41 ubuntuhv kernel: [    9.230399] random: nonblocking pool is
>> initialized
>>> Aug 20 04:04:41 ubuntuhv kernel: [   10.338487] EXT4-fs (sda1): re-
>> mounted. Opts: errors=remount-ro
>>> Aug 20 04:04:41 ubuntuhv kernel: [   11.099094] hv_storvsc vmbus_0_1:
>> cmd 0x85 scsi status 0x2 srb status 0x6
>>> Aug 20 04:04:41 ubuntuhv kernel: [   11.099901] hv_storvsc vmbus_0_1:
>> cmd 0x85 scsi status 0x2 srb status 0x6
>>> Aug 20 04:04:43 ubuntuhv kernel: [   12.999830] psmouse serio1: trackpoint:
>> IBM TrackPoint firmware: 0x01, buttons: 0/0
>>> Aug 20 03:55:47 ubuntuhv kernel: [   13.003659] input: TPPS/2 IBM
>> TrackPoint as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input4
>>> Aug 20 03:57:28 ubuntuhv kernel: [  113.711832] hv_netvsc vmbus_0_14:
>>> net device safe to remove Aug 20 03:57:28 ubuntuhv kernel: [
>>> 113.713882] hv_netvsc: hv_netvsc channel opened successfully Aug 20
>>> 03:57:29 ubuntuhv kernel: [  114.961312] hv_netvsc vmbus_0_14: Send
>>> section size: 6144, Section count:2560 Aug 20 03:57:29 ubuntuhv
>>> kernel: [  114.962711] hv_netvsc vmbus_0_14: Device MAC
>>> 00:15:5d:6f:02:af link state up Aug 20 03:57:34 ubuntuhv kernel: [
>>> 120.027718] hv_netvsc vmbus_0_14: net device safe to remove Aug 20
>>> 03:57:34 ubuntuhv kernel: [  120.030047] hv_netvsc: hv_netvsc channel
>>> opened successfully Aug 20 03:57:34 ubuntuhv kernel: [  120.035422]
>> hv_netvsc vmbus_0_14 eth0: unable to establish receive buffer's gpadl Aug
>> 20 03:57:34 ubuntuhv kernel: [  120.039778] hv_netvsc vmbus_0_14 eth0:
>> unable to connect to NetVSP - 4 Aug 20 03:57:34 ubuntuhv kernel: [
>> 120.039818] ------------[ cut here ]------------ Aug 20 03:57:34 ubuntuhv kernel:
>> [  120.039832] kernel BUG at drivers/hv/channel.c:504!
>>
>> This is one is also a rude BUG_ON:
>>         ret = vmbus_post_msg(msg, sizeof(struct
>> vmbus_channel_close_channel));
>>
>>         BUG_ON(ret != 0);
>>
>> vmbus_post_msg() hv_post_message() can easily return !0.
>> i.e. if this kmalloc() fails:
>>         addr = (unsigned long)kmalloc(sizeof(struct aligned_input),
>> GFP_ATOMIC);
>>         if (!addr)
>>                 return -ENOMEM;
> 
> I will submit a patch to handle this case. I suspect though that the original ASSERT at channel.c (line 504)
> is not related to kmalloc failing in vmbus_post_msg(). I will also look at that issue as well.

I'm sure you can replace most BUG_ON() by a WARN_ON().
Also print more details why the assertion does not hold.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ